Press "Enter" to skip to content

California Didn’t Give Approval in Texting Tax Messages

Nowadays technology has improved everything, and people are opting for more and more digitization. But in some case scenarios, too much of scanning is not a healthy habit and this what happened when there was a plan of texting tax messages rather than presenting on paper forming a notice.  California regulators now not plan to text tax messages.

The California Public Utilities Commission mentioned a brand new FCC ruling prevented the state from levying a tax on text plans. The country hoped to add late monthly fees for wireless clients’ payments to expend funds for programs that carry connectivity to underserved residents. Regulators have been scheduled to vote on the measure on January 10, 2019.

The FCC put the text tax’s future doubtful when it issued a brand new rule on December 12 figuring out textual content messages represent an “info service” — not a “telecommunications service.” CPUC Commissioner Carla Peterman withdrew the text tax proposal “in gentle of the FCC’s motion.”

Proponents of the FCC’s new rule say it’s going to give carriers the flexibility to crack down on spam messages, and critics say it might result in carriers censoring words. The FCC didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark Sunday.

The CPUC’s proposed text tax confronted strong opposition from trade commerce teams, together with CTIA, which represents AT&T Mobility, Sprint, and T-Mobile. (AT&T is the parent firm of CNN.)

The trade group stated the CPUC proposal would have created inequity “between wireless carriers and different suppliers of messaging companies,” similar to WhatsApp, iMessage, and Skype. In an authorized submitting, CTIA referred to as the text tax plan “illogical, anticompetitive, and dangerous to customers.”

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.